Legal Opinion

Howell v. State

Court of Special Appeals of Maryland

Decided December 15, 1983No. 272, September Term, 1983PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MOYLAN, Judge.

The appellant, Burl Anderson Howell, was convicted by a Cecil County jury, of being an accessory after the fact to murder. Upon this appeal, he raises the following nine contentions:

1. That the trial judge erroneously failed to suppress his oral admissions;

2. That the trial judge erroneously prevented him from impeaching a State’s witness with prior inconsistent statements;

3. That the trial judge erroneously permitted the State to impeach its own witness;

4. That the trial judge erred by failing to instruct the jury that if it believed the principal in the first degree had acted…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Burks v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. Greene v. MasseySupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  3. New York State Club Assn., Inc. v. City of New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  4. Mitchell v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1896
  5. Martel v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1960

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Taylor v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2004
  2. Smith v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1985
  3. Stuckey v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2001
  4. Wright v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1987
  5. Johnson v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2001

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API