Legal Opinion

Brannon v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided July 10, 2001No. 1D99-4243PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION ON MOTION FOR REHEARING, REHEARING EN BANC OR CERTIFICATION

2Per curiam

Appellant has filed a motion for rehearing, rehearing en banc, and motion for certification arguing that Harvey v. State, 786 So.2d 595 (Fla. 1st DCA 2001), upon which we relied in our opinion affirming his appeal, was wrongly decided. This court has re-adopted its decision in Harvey. See Harvey v. State, 786 So.2d 28 (Fla. 1st DCA 2001)(opinion on rehearing).

Appellant further argues that, even if the court adheres to its Harvey decision, and Maddox v. State, 760 So.2d 89 (Fla.2000) articulated a policy that all sentencing…

3Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Maddox v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2000
  2. Tascano v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1980
  3. Amendments to Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure 3.111(e) & 3.800Supreme Court of Florida · 1999
  4. Benyard v. WainwrightSupreme Court of Florida · 1975
  5. Harvey v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2001

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by1 opinion

  1. Brannon v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2003

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API