Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Gandy v. Blum

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided November 25, 1981Published

1ConcurrenceHerlihy, J.

Herlihy, J. (concurring). While I am of the opinion that there was a rational basis for the decision of the commissioner, I agree that there should be a reversal in view of the recent decision of the Court of Appeals in Matter of French v Blum (54 NY2d 1017). Because of this and other decisions by the attorneys for petitioner herein, I feel that it is necessary to comment concerning their procedure. In his decision, the commissioner stated as follows: “It is noted, however, that reference was made at the hearing to extensive arrears for heating oil bills, although no exact proof was produced.…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. French v. BlumNew York Court of Appeals · 1981

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API