Legal Opinion

Michael Brannon, PSY.D, and Amlong & Amlong, P.A. v. Daniel Palcu and State of Florida

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided October 28, 2015No. 4D15-894Published

1Per curiam

Petitioners, Dr. Michael Brannon and Amlong and Amlong, the law firm that represents him, seek certiorari review of the trial court’s order compelling them to produce a specific e-mail string between the two, which the court set aside from discovery in a sealed envelope. Respondent, Daniel Palcu, sought the information to demonstrate that Dr. Brannon perpetuated a fraud or obstructed' justice when he testified in respondent’s criminal case.

Petitioners argued to the trial court that the communication was protected as an attorney-client communication. § 90.502, Fla. Stat. (2015). Respondent…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. American Tobacco Co. v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1997
  2. BNP PARIBAS v. WynneDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2007
  3. Merco Group Of The Palm Beaches, Inc. v. John G. McGregor, David Ghysels, David SaragDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API