Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Ferguson

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 19, 1984No. 1799PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HOFFMAN, Judge:

The Commonwealth appeals from a lower court order suppressing all identification evidence. 1 Because we find two of the Commonwealth’s three claims to have merit, we reverse in part and affirm in part.

In the early morning hours of December 25, 1980, in Philadelphia, two men robbed taxicab driver William Pereau at gunpoint. Immediately after the robbery, Pereau contacted police who showed him approximately 100 slides of persons matching Pereau’s description of his assailants. However, appellee’s picture was not among these slides and Pereau made no identification. Nine days…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. United States v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Neil v. BiggersSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. Manson v. BrathwaiteSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  4. Kirby v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  5. United States v. AshSupreme Court of the United States · 1973

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. RichardsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
  2. Western Pennsylvania Socialist Workers 1982 Campaign v. Connecticut General Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
  3. Commonwealth v. NelsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  4. Commonwealth v. SandersSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
  5. Commonwealth v. DoaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API