Goodman v. Internal Revenue Service (In re Adams)
United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
JAMES R. SACCA, Bankruptcy Judge.
Today the Court addresses a question that has divided bankruptcy courts: Is a creditor’s late-filed proof of claim in a Chapter 13 case necessarily barred even if the creditor did not receive notice of the case in time to file a timely claim? Some courts hold that late-filed claims are barred regardless of the creditor’s lack of notice. Other courts hold that late-filed claims should be allowed if the creditor did not receive notice. This Court finds the *646latter position persuasive and concludes that late-filed claims in a Chapter 13 case should be allowed…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- City of New York v. New York, New Haven & Hartford RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
- United States v. Cardinal Mine Supply, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1990
- In the Matter of Mary Leasure Unroe, DebtorCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1991
- In Re David Allen Hairopoulos, Debtor. United States of America, Acting by and Through the Internal Revenue Service v. David Allen HairopoulosCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1997
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Shannon Ladon WoodUnited States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Alabama · 2025
- Yasmani Figueredo Aguilar and Farideth Aimee MaldonadoUnited States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Florida. · 2025