Schmitt v. Bordelon
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
WEAVER, Chief Justice.
This is an appeal from a default judgment entered pursuant to the trial court’s assessment of discovery abuse sanctions.
We affirm.
Roland Schmitt, the decedent’s surviving husband, brought a probate suit to recover property under the terms of decedent’s will, to set aside community property, and for recovery of a spousal allowance. Schmitt was served with interrogatories and a request for production by Wilma Harper Bordelon, the independent executrix of decedent’s estate, on June 28, 1990. It was undisputed that Schmitt never responded to the discovery requests.…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Downer v. Aquamarine Operators, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1985
- Johnson v. Fourth Court of AppealsTexas Supreme Court · 1985
- TransAmerican Natural Gas Corp. v. PowellTexas Supreme Court · 1991
- Gee v. Liberty Mutual Fire Insurance Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1989
- Chrysler Corp. v. Honorable Robert BlackmonTexas Supreme Court · 1992
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Buck v. Estate of Buck, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2009
- Gentry v. Weaver Development Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1995
- Jeffrey Buck v. Estate of Lillian M. Buck and Oscar A. Buck, Administrator and Independent of the Estate of Lillian M. Buck, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2009
- Jeffrey Buck v. Estate of Lillian M. Buck and Oscar A. Buck, Administrator and Independent of the Estate of Lillian M. Buck, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2009