Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Malone v. Malone

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided December 28, 1995No. 49A04-9507-CV-266Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partDarden, Judge

I respectfully concur in part and dissent in part.

In regard to Issue II, I believe the majority's approach in raising the issue of the propriety of the trial court's award of credit against Donald's child support arrearage sua sponte is correct. Furthermore, I agree with its determination that, pursuant to DeMichieli, Kaplon, and Baker, the trial court erred by allowing Donald a two-thirds (66% %) credit against the child support arrear-age. Clearly, the credit for Donald's having paid a substantial portion of the couple's tax liability was not a conforming child support payment.

However,…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. In re the Marriage of TearmanIndiana Court of Appeals · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API