Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Cunagin Construction Corp. v. Creech

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided December 17, 1969No. 69-197PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

The written denial of the planning commission of the validity of the application for a building permit and its refusal to act on the same constituted the final act of respondents, the lawfulness of which was subject to review by appeal pursuant to Section 2506.01 et seq., Revised Code. Relator has failed to show or explain why that remedy was inadequate or unavailable.

The judgment of the Court of Appeals in denying the writ of mandamus is, therefore, affirmed on the authority of paragraph three of the syllabus of State, ex rel. Pressley, v. Indus. Comm., 11 Ohio St. 2d 141.

Judgment affirmed.

Ta…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. State ex rel. Pressley v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1967

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Eliza Jennings, Inc. v. NobleOhio Supreme Court · 1990
  2. State, Ex Rel. Fontaine v. Hanover Bd, TrusteesOhio Court of Appeals · 1984
  3. In Re Petition for Annexation of 5.11 Acres in Northampton Twp.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1986

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API