Bourget v. Government Employees Insurance
District Court, D. Connecticut
1Opinion
MOTION FOR REHEARING
GEICO’s original motion to dismiss was based on the contention that plaintiff, the injured party, had no direct cause of action against GEICO, the insurer, to recover the excess over the policy limits on the ground that the insurer negligently failed to settle within the policy limits. The Court rejected GEICO’s contention and held that “the language of Conn.Gen.Stat. § 38-175 clearly subrogates the injured person to all the insured’s rights against the insurer.” 287 F.Supp. at 110.
GEICO’s motion for rehearing is addressed principally to the Court’s decision of July 19,…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Comunale v. Traders & General InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1958
- Barr v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- United States v. Missouri Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1929
- Browder v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Auto Mutual Indemnity Co. v. ShawSupreme Court of Florida · 1938
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.