Legal Opinion

Pellegrino v. Maloof

Court of Special Appeals of Maryland

Decided November 9, 1983No. 111, September Term, 1983PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LOWE, Judge.

Reading the brief and record extract of appellants Joseph A. and John R. Pellegrino is like entering a movie in the middle. Our understanding is further impeded by the failure of appellee Naji Maloof, Personal Representative of Joseph Louis Pellegrino’s estate, to respond. As best we can perceive, appellants are the sons of Joseph L. Pellegrino who entered a third marriage late in life. Prior to this belated nuptial bliss with Shirley Benedict Pellegrino, Joseph L. had by will bequeathed his entire estate to his sons, Joseph A. and John R. At issue primarily is a substantial…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. United States v. ThrockmortonSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  2. Schwartz v. Merchants Mortgage Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1974
  3. Weitz v. MacKenzieCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1975
  4. Hughes v. Beltway Homes, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1975
  5. Blue Bird Cab Co. v. Maryland Department of Employment SecurityCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1968

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Baptist Hosp. of Miami, Inc. v. CarterDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1995
  2. 1000 Friends v. EhrlichCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2006
  3. Markert v. BeatleyCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1990

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API