Legal Opinion · Dissent

Denson v. Moses

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama

Decided May 2, 2008No. 2070140Published

1DissentThompson, Presiding Judge

After reviewing the record, I conclude that Terry Denson failed to meet the burden required to submit the issue of Robert Moses’s testamentary capacity to a jury. Accordingly, I must respectfully dissent.

“ ‘An appellate court, when reviewing a ruling on a motion for a judgment as a matter of law, uses the same standard the trial court used initially in granting or denying the motion. Regarding questions of fact, the ultimate question is whether the nonmovant presented sufficient evidence to allow the case or the issue to be submitted to the jury for a factual resolution.... [T]he nonmovant…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. West v. Founders Life Assur. Co. of FloridaSupreme Court of Alabama · 1989
  2. Ex Parte HelmsSupreme Court of Alabama · 2003
  3. Tucker v. TuckerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1946
  4. Bell v. T.R. Miller Company, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2000
  5. Fletcher v. DeLoachSupreme Court of Alabama · 1978

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API