Legal Opinion

Haines v. O'Conner

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided March 2, 1880PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal from the County Court of Cook county; the Hon. Mason B. Loomis, Judge, presiding.

1Opinion of the CourtMcAllister, J.

This was a suit by attachment, brought in the Cook County Court, by Dennis O’Conner against Machris & Beichendorff, upon an indebtedness from the latter to the former of §608.48, and the appellant, J. Charles Haines was summoned and auswefed as garnishee. Issues were formed upon his answer, on the trial of which the jury returned a verdict finding that he had $1,615.73 in his hands belonging to Machris & Beichendorff. The court, overruling appellant’s motion for new trial, gave judgment on the verdict, and Haines brings the case in this court by appeal.

The record presents various questions,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Cariker v. AndersonIllinois Supreme Court · 1862
  2. Rankin v. SimondsIllinois Supreme Court · 1862
  3. Farrell v. PearsonIllinois Supreme Court · 1861
  4. Towner v. F. George & SonIllinois Supreme Court · 1870
  5. Warne v. KendallIllinois Supreme Court · 1875

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Home Insurance Co. of New York v. KirkAppellate Court of Illinois · 1887
  2. Merchant v. HowlandAppellate Court of Illinois · 1892
  3. Rand, McNally & Co. v. PomeroyAppellate Court of Illinois · 1894
  4. Surine v. Fort Dearborn Natl. BankAppellate Court of Illinois · 1895

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API