Legal Opinion

United States ex rel. Smith v. Pate

District Court, N.D. Illinois

Decided February 26, 1969No. 68 C 2006PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ROBSON, District Judge.

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER ON RESPONDENT’S MOTION TO DISMISS

The respondent, Frank J. Pate, has filed a return to the rule to show cause why the petitioner, William Smith, should not be granted a writ of habeas corpus. For the reasons set forth below, this court is of the opinion that the petition for a writ of habeas corpus should be dismissed.

The petitioner was convicted of illegal possession of narcotics by the Circuit Court of Cook County and sentenced to imprisonment for not less than twenty nor more than forty years. He subsequently appealed to the Supreme Court of…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Mapp v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  2. Johnson v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  3. Linkletter v. WalkerSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  4. McCray v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  5. The People v. MacKIllinois Supreme Court · 1957

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. People v. LawsIllinois Supreme Court · 1981
  2. United States v. Mitchell-HunterCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2011
  3. The People v. O'KierseyIllinois Supreme Court · 1970
  4. United States ex rel. Mayfield v. PateDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1969
  5. United States ex rel. Mayfield v. PateCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1971

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API