Legal Opinion

Muller v. Earle

The Superior Court of New York City

Decided April 15, 1874Published

Motiori for leave to amend complaint, or to file supplemental complaint.

1Opinion of the CourtFreedmah, J.

This saction was originally commenced by Louis Muller, as one for equitable relief. It was brought against the defendant Earle, the Mayor, Aldermen and Commonalty of the city of Hew York, and Bichard B. Connolly, as comptroller, of said city, to ascertain and determine the amount due to Louis Muller for certain buildings erected by him and taken by the corporation of the city of Hew York in proceedings for a street improvement, and to decree its payment out of the amount of a certain award then in the hands of the comptroller, and made in said proceedings to the defendant Earle, as the owner…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Slauson v. EnglehartNew York Supreme Court · 1861
  2. Wattson v. ThibouNew York Supreme Court · 1863
  3. Buchanan v. ComstockNew York Supreme Court · 1866
  4. Dann v. BakerNew York Supreme Court · 1855

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API