Silverman v. Shaoul
New York Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Eileen Bransten, J.
Defendants Benjamin Shaoul, Marc Ravner, Lemadre Development, LLC and Magnum Management, LLC (the defendants) move to compel plaintiffs Blake and Tracy Silverman (the plaintiffs) to pay for costs of electronic discovery. Plaintiffs oppose.
The parties are familiar with the facts of this matter, and therefore the facts are only discussed as necessary.
Analysis
Defendants move to compel plaintiffs to pay for the costs of “collecting, processing and hosting electronic data” incurred due to plaintiffs’ requests for disclosure. (Defendants’ mem of law in support…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Brennan v. National Equitable Investment Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1928
- Russell v. Raynes Associates Ltd.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
- Etzion v. EtzionNew York Supreme Court · 2005
- Waltzer v. Tradescape & Co., LLCAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
- Clarendon National Insurance v. Atlantic Risk Management, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- U.S. Bank National Ass'n v. Greenpoint Mortgage Funding, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012