Legal Opinion

Intertype Corporation v. Strosnider

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided January 2, 1923No. 10808PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCochran, J.

This was an action brought by the Intertype Corporation, as plaintiff, against John Strosnider, as defendant, for the possession of one Intertype machine. From judgment in favor of the defendant, the plaintiff has prosecuted this appeal. The record shows that defendant formerly owned the Timas-Democrat at Pawnee, Okla., and in 1917 sold the plant to Harry Lloyd, receiving some cash and a mortgage on the plant for the balance of the price. Lloyd sold the plant to A. M. Armstrong, and thereafter plaintiff sold Armstrong one In-tertype machine for $3,230, for which Armstrong paid $100 in cash…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Blanchard v. CookeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1887
  2. Mitchell v. Guaranty State Bank of OkmulgeeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918
  3. Raynor v. NortonMichigan Supreme Court · 1875
  4. Hallfors v. GoveMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1916

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. American National Bank & Trust Co. v. National Cash Register Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1970
  2. K. C. Tire Co. v. Way Motor Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1930
  3. Howell v. War Finance Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1934
  4. Elder v. SturgesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API