MacKlin v. State

OPINION

STATON, Judge.

Maurice Maeklin appeals his conviction for Possession of Cocaine, 1 a Class D felony, and his conviction for Possession of Marijuana, 2 a Class A misdemeanor. Maeklin raises two issues on appeal, which we restate as:

I. Whether the trial court abused its discretion by denying Macklin’s oral motion for continuance.

II. Whether the evidence was sufficient to support Macklin’s conviction for Possession of Cocaine.

We affirm.

I

Denial of Continuance

Maeklin contends that the trial court erred in denying his oral motion for continuance on the day of trial.

In support of the oral…