Legal Opinion

Head v. Brainard

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided April 20, 1925No. 4383PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHunt, Circuit Judge

(after stating the facts as above). Plaintiffs in error contend that the District Court made no decision upon the question of title and was without pow- • er to make such determination in the present action; that the trustee could not maintain this action; that it was error for the court to refuse to permit defendants below to prove ownership of the property and to direct a verdict in favor of plaintiff below.

In our opinion the court by its order of confirmation of the master’s report in the ancillary bankruptcy proceedings adjudged that the bankrupt estate had title to the property in…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Taubel-Scott-Kitzmiller Co. v. FoxSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
  2. Myers v. International Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1923
  3. Cohen v. HesselCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1922

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. MacDonald v. AdamsDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1941
  2. Tornado Southern, Inc. v. Harry's Auto Parts, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1969
  3. Wolf v. KijakaziDistrict Court, E.D. Washington · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API