Legal Opinion

In re the Claim of Encarnacao

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided November 21, 2007PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed February 7, 2007, which ruled that claimant was disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits because she voluntarily left her employment without good cause.

Claimant worked 24 hours per week at the employer’s department store as a customer service manager. She resigned from her position after her schedule was changed and her hours were reduced to 20 hours per week. The Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board ruled that claimant was disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits because she…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. In re the Claim of KubiakAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
  2. In re the Claim of BenyoussefAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
  3. In re the Claim of ShifreenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. In re the Claim of HurleyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
  2. In re Claim of DiermyerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API