Legal Opinion

Levinshon v. Edwards

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided December 15, 1885PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Appeal from the Circuit Court of Mobile. Tried before the Hon. Vm. E. Clarke. cited ü. S. v. Kellum, 19 Blatch. 372; U. S. v. French, 14 Phil. (Penn.) 497; 16 Fed. Rep. 657; 20 Fed. Rep. 520 ; 1 Brick. Dig. 140, §§ 72-3, cited Rev. Stat. U. S., §§ 4532-34.

1Opinion of the CourtClopton, J.

The complaint, as amended, contained a special count, and the common count for money had and received. A demurrer was interposed to the special count, which was sustained. The parties proceeded to trial on the common count, and, in consequence of adverse rulings on the exclusion of evidence, the plaintiff suffered a non-suit, taking a bill of exceptions. In this condition of the record, our inquiry is restricted to the questions presented by the exclusion of evidence. In such case, the ruling on the demurrer to the complaint is not the proper subject of an assignment of error, and can not be…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Planters' & Merchants' Insurance v. TunstallSupreme Court of Alabama · 1882
  2. Rogers's Administrator v. JonesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1874

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Allen v. M. Mendelsohn & SonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1922
  2. Farmers' Bank & Trust Co. v. Shut & KeihnSupreme Court of Alabama · 1916
  3. Alabama Dry Dock & Shipbuilding Co. v. WardAlabama Court of Appeals · 1946
  4. Hudson v. ScottSupreme Court of Alabama · 1899
  5. Gulfport Fert. Co. v. JonesAlabama Court of Appeals · 1916

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API