Legal Opinion

Thornton v. Houck

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided December 9, 1926PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtMiddleton, J.

Plaintiff in error was the administrator of his deceased wife. Defendants in error are the children and heirs at law of said administrator and his decedent. In Probate Court the heirs filed exceptions to the account-of the administartor. The Court overruled said exceptions, The heirs appealed to the Court of. Common Pleas. In that Court it was determined that the administrator had- wrongfully charged the estate with the funeral expenses of his deceased wife and also ■ the charge made by the attending physiian during her last sickness. The ease is here on the exceptions of Thornton to the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Humphrey v. HuffOhio Court of Appeals · 1914

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Hunter v. McKinneyMadison County Court of Common Pleas · 1951

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API