Legal Opinion · Dissent

Smith v. Standard Oil Company

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided January 7, 1971No. 26222Published

1DissentGrice, Justice

I feel strongly that the defendant should have been allowed to show that the option contract was delivered to the optionee subject to the condition that the defendant’s husband approve it, and that his approval was not obtained.

Consideration of such evidence is authorized by Code § 20-901, which provides that, "Any fact going to show that the original contract was not obligatory, though executed, may be set up as a defense”; and by Code §20-902, which in essential part declares that, "A condition, precedent or subsequent, not complied with . . . may be pleaded as a defense.”

Therefore, I…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Ware v. AllenSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
  2. Heitmann v. Commercial BankCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1909
  3. Moore v. Farmers' Mutual Insurance Asso.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1899
  4. Hansford v. FreemanSupreme Court of Georgia · 1896
  5. Bass Dry Goods Co. v. Granite City Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1903

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API