Legal Opinion
Marshall v. Oil, Chemical & Atomic Workers International Union
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided April 23, 1981No. Nos. 80-1942, 80-1943PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
A. LEON HIGGINBOTHAM, Jr., Circuit Judge.
The issue in this case is whether the Occupational Safety and Health Review Commission (Commission) erred when, in a 2 to 1 vote, it decided that the Oil, Chemical and Atomic Workers International Union (Union) had the right to object to a proposed settlement between American Cyan-amid Company (American Cyanamid) and *385the Secretary of Labor (Secretary) on grounds other than the reasonableness of the abatement period fixed in the settlement agreement. The Commission’s Order was entered on April 30, 1980, one month prior to our court’s…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Cohen v. Beneficial Industrial Loan Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Marshall v. Sun Petroleum Products Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1980
- 9 O.S.H. Cas.(bna) 1031, 1980 O.S.H.D. (Cch) P 24,990 Ray Marshall, Secretary of Labor and Imc Chemical Group, Inc. v. Occupational Safety and Health Review Commission and Local 7-854, Oil, Chemical and Atomic Workers International UnionCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1980
3Cited by3 opinions
- 9 O.S.H. Cas.(bna) 1584, 1981 O.S.H.D. (Cch) P 25,331 Ray Marshall, Secretary of Labor v. Oil, Chemical and Atomic Workers International Union and Its Local 4-208, and Occupational Safety and Health Review Commission, American Cyanamid Company v. Occupational Safety and Health Review Commission and Oil, Chemical and Atomic Workers International Union and Its Local 4-208Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1981
- Engelhard Industries v. Occupational Safety And Health Review CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1983
- Engelhard Industries, Division of Engelhard Corp. v. Occupational Safety & Health Review CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1983