Roberts v. Warness
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtHolcomb, J.
— The amended complaint in this action, on which the case was tried by the court without a jury, after alleging the qualifications of Dr. W. C. Speidel, alleged that, at the request of appellant, he rendered professional, medical and surgical services to the wife of appellant at the Columbus hospital in Seattle, King county, Washington, the services consisting of and in the performance of a surgical operation upon the wife; that the services were of the value of two hundred fifty dollars; that demand had been made for payment which was by appellant refused; that the account had been duly…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Russell v. GraumannWashington Supreme Court · 1905
- Haddad v. ChapinWashington Supreme Court · 1929
3Cited by3 opinions
- In Re DenissonWashington Supreme Court · 1938
- DeNisson v. National Bank of CommerceWashington Supreme Court · 1938
- Malakoff v. FryeCity of New York Municipal Court · 1935