Legal Opinion

Curtis v. Hawley

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided November 3, 1899PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Assumpsit, for money paid, etc.—Appeal from the Circuit Court of Cook County; the Hon. Charles G. Neely, Judge, presiding. Heard in this court at the March term, 1899.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Adams

The appellant purchased from appellee certain premises in Lake county, Illinois, known as Slusser’s Park, and paid to appelleee $500 of the purchase money, for which appellee gave a receipt, as follows:

“ October 4, 1892.

Received of B. Curtis, five hundred dollars, on account of purchase of property at Gray’s Lake, known as Slusser’s Park, for the sum of seven thousand dollars, provided the abstract is correct; if not satisfactory, the money is to be returned. Henby S. Hawley.”

Appellee, in pursuance of the agreement, delivered to F. W. Young, appellant’s attorney, about October 6th or 7th, an…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Piper v. ConnellyIllinois Supreme Court · 1884
  2. Lehndorf v. CopeIllinois Supreme Court · 1887
  3. Vermont Street M. E. Church v. BroseIllinois Supreme Court · 1882
  4. Gale v. DeanIllinois Supreme Court · 1858
  5. Turpin v. Baltimore, Ohio & Chicago RailroadIllinois Supreme Court · 1882

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Rittenhouse & Embree Co. v. BarryAppellate Court of Illinois · 1901
  2. Whitfield v. McClendonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1948
  3. Crane v. ClemensAppellate Court of Illinois · 1907
  4. Slack v. KnoxAppellate Court of Illinois · 1904

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API