Kulp v. Brant
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Appeal, No. 80, Jan. T., 1894, by defendant, from judgment of C. P. Montgomery Co., June T., 1891, No. 5, on feigned issue, in favor of plaintiff. Feigned issue to determine ownership of proceeds of life insurance policy, paid into court. Before Weand, J. The facts appear by the opinion of the Supreme Court.
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Mr. Justice Dean,
On September 2, 1868, Nathan R. Brant took out a policy of insurance on his life in the sum of $2,000, in the .¿Etna Life Insurance Company. The beneficiary in the policy was his wife, Catharine Brant, and it was declared to be for her sole separate use and benefit.' The annual premium was f67.52. On the 2d *224of August, 1876, Mrs. Brant, joined by her husband under their seals duly attested, executed a formal transfer of the policy to Kulp, this plaintiff, as collateral for a debt owing by the husband to Kulp, and the assignment stipulates that Kulp is to have “ all…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Hartranft's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1893
- Johnston v. PattersonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1886
3Cited by16 opinions
- Herr v. ReinoehlSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1904
- Mente v. TownsendSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1900
- Newhall v. ArnettSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1924
- Donaldson v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1921
- Bartholomew v. Allentown National BankSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1918
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.