Legal Opinion

Risner v. McDonald's Corp.

Texas Court of Appeals, 9th District (Beaumont)

Decided June 8, 2000No. 09-98-311 CVPublishedCited by 54 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

JOHN HILL, Justice (Assigned).

Jamie Risner appeals from a summary judgment that she take nothing in her personal injury suit against McDonald’s Corporation, McDonald’s Restaurants of Texas, Inc., Danrose Management Co., Danrose Corporation, and Tina Dunham. She initially presents three points of error in which she contends that the trial court erred in granting the appellees’ motions for summary judgment. Following oral argument, the court granted Risner leave to file a supplemental brief with additional points of error. In those two additional points of error, Risner urges that the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Nixon v. Mr. Property Management Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Koch Refining Co. v. ChapaTexas Supreme Court · 2000
  3. Grant v. Southwestern Electric Power Co., Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2000
  4. Smith v. Foodmaker, Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1996
  5. Hillert v. MeltonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1933

3Cited by54 opinions

  1. Baty v. ProTech Insurance Agency, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2002
  2. Rivera v. Countrywide Home Loans, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2008
  3. LaGoye v. Victoria Wood Condominium Ass'n, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2003
  4. Northern Natural Gas Co. v. Chisos Joint Venture I, Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)2004
  5. Carbonara v. Texas Stadium Corp., Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2008

49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API