Legal Opinion
Horowitz v. Eidelheit
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York
Decided January 15, 1915PublishedCited by 1 opinion
Appeal from Municipal Court, Borough of Manhattan, Eighth District. Action by Nathan Horowitz and another against. Isak Eidelheit. From a judgment for defendant and against plaintiffs, the latter appeal.
1Opinion of the CourtLehman, J.
The plaintiffs and the defendant on March 18, 1914, entered into a lease of certain premises in the city of New York for a term expiring March 31, 1917. The lease contained the following clauses:
“(17) The party of the second part deposits with the parties of the first part the sum of five hundred ($500.00) dollars, to be held and retained by the parties of the first part as and for security for the payment of the rent agreed to be paid hereunder, and for the reimbursement of the parties of the first part for any expenses or damage incurred or suffered because of the failure of the party of…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Michaels v. . FishelNew York Court of Appeals · 1902
- Hall v. . GouldNew York Court of Appeals · 1855
- Anzolone v. PaskuszAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1904
3Cited by1 opinion
- Erlenbell v. Sound Realty Co.Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1916