Boushell v. Foxworth

Smith, Judge.

Boushell sued Foxworth on a contract, alleging Foxworth owed money which was advanced to Foxworth as a draw against sales commissions. The trial court, sitting without a jury, entered judgment for Foxworth, and Boushell appeals, contending the trial court unduly restricted the range of examination of witnesses and applied the wrong principles of law to the contract. Finding no error, we affirm.

Boushell, regional distributor of a product, accepted Foxworth as an associate distributor and orally agreed to pay Foxworth a $1,200 monthly advance against the commissions he would earn.…