Legal Opinion

Muller v. Senkowski

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided March 16, 2001No. Docket No. 00-2196Published

1Opinion of the Court

SUMMARY ORDER

UPON DUE CONSIDERATION, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that the judgment of the district court be, and it hereby is, AFFIRMED.

Petitioner Ra’ Shaun Muller appeals from a judgment of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York (Weinstein, J.) dismissing his petition for a writ of habeas corpus. Muller challenged a judgment of conviction following a jury trial in the New York Supreme Court, Kings County, for second degree (felony) murder and first degree burglary. The Appellate Division affirmed the judgement of conviction, see People v. Muller,…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. United States v. Leona M. Helmsley, Joseph v. Licari and Frank J. Turco, Leona M. HelmsleyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1991
  2. United States v. John PatinoCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1992
  3. UNITED STATES of America, Appellee, v. Michele SINDONA, Defendant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1980
  4. United States v. Louis HeimannCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1983
  5. United States v. Stanley Mollica and Marie Cirillo, United States of America, Appellee-Cross-Appellant v. Marie Cirillo, Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1988

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API