Legal Opinion

Walters v. Smith

Kentucky Supreme Court

Decided April 22, 1980PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LUKOWSKY, Justice.

The question presented is whether the release of a habeas corpus petitioner moots his case. The Court of Appeals answered yes. We reverse and remand with directions that the appeal from the dismissal of the habeas corpus petition be determined on its merits.

The relevant facts are simple. Walters, pro se, petitioned the circuit court from a writ of habeas corpus, which was denied. Walters then filed his notice of appeal from the judgment. While the appeal was pending, Walters was paroled. In response to a show cause from the Court of Appeals Walters argued that the parole did…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Jones v. CunninghamSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. Smith v. HensonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1944
  3. Vickery v. LadyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1953

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Fryrear v. ParkerKentucky Supreme Court · 1996
  2. Muhammad v. Kentucky Parole BoardKentucky Supreme Court · 2015
  3. Durand Edward Murrell v. Don Bottom Warden, Northpoint Training CenterKentucky Supreme Court · 2017
  4. Durand Edward Murrell v. Don Bottom Warden, Northpoint Training CenterKentucky Supreme Court · 2017
  5. Durand Edward Murrell v. Don Bottom Warden, Northpoint Training CenterKentucky Supreme Court · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API