Legal Opinion

Dearden v. Galli

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided June 2, 1955No. 3772PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

2Per curiam

This is an appeal from a ruling of the clerk of this court upon costs, pursuant to Rule VI of the rules of this court. The sole question is as to the right of the prevailing party upon an appeal to recover as costs of the appeal the amount paid to a surety company as premium for supersedeas and appeal bond. The appellant having prevailed herein upon his appeal from judgment of the trial court (70 Nev. 543, 277 P.2d 381) a cost bill was filed by him which included the item of $1,259.06 bond premium. Objection to this item was made by the respondent and the objection sustained by the…

3Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Dixon v. Second Judicial District Court of the State of Nevada ex rel. County of WashoeNevada Supreme Court · 1920
  2. Richards v. VermilyeaNevada Supreme Court · 1918
  3. State ex rel. Springmeyer v. BakerNevada Supreme Court · 1912
  4. Dearden v. GalliNevada Supreme Court · 1954
  5. McKenzie v. CoslettNevada Supreme Court · 1905

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by5 opinions

  1. Sun Realty v. Eighth Judicial District Court of the State of Nevada Ex Rel. County of ClarkNevada Supreme Court · 1975
  2. Angell v. Eighth Judicial District Court of the State of NevadaNevada Supreme Court · 1992
  3. City of Las Vegas v. Southwest Gas CorporationNevada Supreme Court · 1974
  4. Braun v. Hassenstein Steel Co.District Court, D. South Dakota · 1959
  5. Flangas v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 1981

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API