State v. Bishop
Utah Supreme Court
1Concurrence
ZIMMERMAN, Justice:
(concurring in the result).
I join the Chief Justice in affirming Arthur Gary Bishop’s convictions and sentences. However, I cannot agree with the Chief Justice that, with one exception, Bishop’s trial was error-free. The remainder of this opinion explains what errors I think were committed.1 My ultimate conclusion is that all the errors in Bishop’s trial were harmless. For that reason alone, I vote to affirm.
Before proceeding, however, I must observe that given the way the State chose to charge Bishop and to present its case, numerous complex and subtle legal questions were…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Gregg v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Pulley v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Michelson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Boyd v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- State v. LaffertyUtah Supreme Court · 1988
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.