Legal Opinion · Concurrence

State v. Bishop

Utah Supreme Court

Decided February 3, 1988No. 19907Published

1Concurrence

ZIMMERMAN, Justice:

(concurring in the result).

I join the Chief Justice in affirming Arthur Gary Bishop’s convictions and sentences. However, I cannot agree with the Chief Justice that, with one exception, Bishop’s trial was error-free. The remainder of this opinion explains what errors I think were committed.1 My ultimate conclusion is that all the errors in Bishop’s trial were harmless. For that reason alone, I vote to affirm.

Before proceeding, however, I must observe that given the way the State chose to charge Bishop and to present its case, numerous complex and subtle legal questions were…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Gregg v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Pulley v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  3. Michelson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
  4. Boyd v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  5. State v. LaffertyUtah Supreme Court · 1988

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API