Legal Opinion

Carew v. Mathews

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided October 18, 1882PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Error to Wayne. Replevin. Defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtMaeston, J.

Tbe defendant by virtue of an execution .■against the husband of the plaintiff levied upon certain ■chests of tea, in a store -which the plaintiff claimed to be in possession of, and removed the same therefrom. The plaintiff thereupon as owner of the goods taken brought an action •of replevin therefor, and obtained a verdict and judgment •in her favor. The defendant assigns error.

‘The defendant upon the trial claimed, and introduced evidence tending to prove, that the property taken belonged to the execution defendant; that the plaintiff’s claim was a fraudulent one, made in order to cover up…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Leland v. CollverMichigan Supreme Court · 1876
  2. Judge v. VogelMichigan Supreme Court · 1878
  3. Flanigan v. LampmanMichigan Supreme Court · 1863

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Amperse v. Common CouncilMichigan Supreme Court · 1886
  2. State v. CallahanSupreme Court of Iowa · 1895

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API