Kirkman v. Owens-Illinois Forest Products Division
Supreme Court of Florida
1Per curiam
We have considered the petition for writ •of certiorari, the record and the briefs in this cause. We find that oral 'argument would serve no useful purpose. It is dispensed with pursuant to Florida Appellate Rule 3.10, subd. e, 31 F.S.A,
The deputy found the claimant-petitioner to be permanently :and totally disabled and also refused to apportion the disability between the two accidents leading to this •claim and an earlier one. He held the provisions of the Special Disability Fund applicable. The Full Commission reversed this portion of the deputy’s order, saying that the record did not…
2Cited by1 opinion
- Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co. v. Special Disability FundSupreme Court of Florida · 1971