Buice v. State

Bernes, Judge.

Stevenson Troy Buice appeals his conviction of armed robbery. He challenges the sufficiency of the evidence identifying him as the criminal perpetrator and contends that the trial court erred in denying his motion in limine to exclude the testimony of a state’s witness that allegedly brought his character into issue. We find no error and affirm.

1. Buice contends that the evidence was insufficient to sustain his convictions. We disagree.

On appeal from a criminal conviction, we view the evidence in the light most favorable to the verdict, and the defendant no longer enjoys the…