State v. . Denson
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtAdams, J.
Tbe ordinance affects three classes of persons: (1) residents; (2) nonresidents wbo conduct a business, practice a profession, or are employed in tbe city; (3) those wbo remain in tbe city for more than thirty days. Under tbe special verdict, tbe defendants are treated as falling within tbe second class; their homes are outside tbe corporate limits, but they are employees of a railroad company, whose shops are within tbe city, and they regularly drive their cars to and from the place in which they work. When arrested they were driving upon tbe streets of tbe city without a license.
Tbe…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Soon Hing v. CrowleySupreme Court of the United States · 1885
- Reinman v. City of Little RockSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
- Armour Packing Co. v. LacySupreme Court of the United States · 1906
- State v. . MooreSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1889
- Gatlin v. Town of TarboroSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1878
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- State v. . DixonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1939
- State v. DixonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1939
- Hart v. Board of CommissionersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1926
- Hilton v. . HarrisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1934
- State v. GreenwoodCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1971
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.