United States v. 8402 W. 132nd Street, Palos Park, Ill.
District Court, N.D. Illinois
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
ZAGEL, District Judge.
Melody, Joseph and Jane Foley want me to stop the forfeiture of William Foley’s home. While the Constitution grants substantial power to the federal courts, see Marbury v. Madison, 1 Cranch 137, 2 L.Ed. 60 (1803), judicial power is limited to cases and controversies. U.S. Const., Art. Ill § 2. This limitation requires a plaintiff (or in this case, a claimant) to have standing, ie., a personal stake in the outcome of the litigation that demonstrates concrete adverseness between the litigants. Baker v. Carr, 369 U.S. 186, 204, 82 S.Ct. 691, 703,…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Friends of the Earth, Inc. v. Laidlaw Environmental Services (TOC), Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Baker v. CarrSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Marbury v. MadisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1803
- Federal Election Commission v. AkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Van Dyke v. Cook County Sheriff's OfficeDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2022