Legal Opinion

United States v. 8402 W. 132nd Street, Palos Park, Ill.

District Court, N.D. Illinois

Decided March 9, 2000No. 97 C 8552PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

ZAGEL, District Judge.

Melody, Joseph and Jane Foley want me to stop the forfeiture of William Foley’s home. While the Constitution grants substantial power to the federal courts, see Marbury v. Madison, 1 Cranch 137, 2 L.Ed. 60 (1803), judicial power is limited to cases and controversies. U.S. Const., Art. Ill § 2. This limitation requires a plaintiff (or in this case, a claimant) to have standing, ie., a personal stake in the outcome of the litigation that demonstrates concrete adverseness between the litigants. Baker v. Carr, 369 U.S. 186, 204, 82 S.Ct. 691, 703,…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Friends of the Earth, Inc. v. Laidlaw Environmental Services (TOC), Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
  3. Baker v. CarrSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  4. Marbury v. MadisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1803
  5. Federal Election Commission v. AkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1998

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Van Dyke v. Cook County Sheriff's OfficeDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API