In re Rivastigmine Patent Litigation
District Court, S.D. New York
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
JAMES C. FRANCIS IV, United States Magistrate Judge.
Defendants Watson Pharmaceuticals Inc. and Watson Laboratories, Inc. (collectively, “Watson”) and Sun Pharmaceutical Ltd. (“Sun”) seek to amend their answers and counterclaims against plaintiffs Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation, Novartis AG, Novartis Pharma AG, Novartis International Pharmaceutical Ltd. and Proterra AG (collectively, “Novartis”) to add a claim for attorneys’ fees.1 Novartis opposes the motion. For the reasons set forth below, the defendants’ motion is granted.
Background
This multidistrict litigation…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Ryder Energy Distribution Corporation v. Merrill Lynch Commodities Inc., E.F. Hutton & Co., Inc., and New York Mercantile ExchangeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1984
- Block v. First Blood AssociatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1993
- Vito Milanese, Jr. And Suzanne Milanese v. Rust-Oleum CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2001
- Newell Companies, Inc. v. Kenney Manufacturing Company, Defendant/cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1989
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Harris v. ColemanDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2012
- Sitzer v. National Association of RealtorsDistrict Court, W.D. Missouri · 2022