Legal Opinion

In re Rivastigmine Patent Litigation

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided June 4, 2007No. 05 MD 1661(HB)(JCF)PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

JAMES C. FRANCIS IV, United States Magistrate Judge.

Defendants Watson Pharmaceuticals Inc. and Watson Laboratories, Inc. (collectively, “Watson”) and Sun Pharmaceutical Ltd. (“Sun”) seek to amend their answers and counterclaims against plaintiffs Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation, Novartis AG, Novartis Pharma AG, Novartis International Pharmaceutical Ltd. and Proterra AG (collectively, “Novartis”) to add a claim for attorneys’ fees.1 Novartis opposes the motion. For the reasons set forth below, the defendants’ motion is granted.

Background

This multidistrict litigation…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  2. Ryder Energy Distribution Corporation v. Merrill Lynch Commodities Inc., E.F. Hutton & Co., Inc., and New York Mercantile ExchangeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1984
  3. Block v. First Blood AssociatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1993
  4. Vito Milanese, Jr. And Suzanne Milanese v. Rust-Oleum CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2001
  5. Newell Companies, Inc. v. Kenney Manufacturing Company, Defendant/cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1989

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Harris v. ColemanDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2012
  2. Sitzer v. National Association of RealtorsDistrict Court, W.D. Missouri · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API