Legal Opinion

Rhine v. Bogardus

California Supreme Court

Decided July 1, 1859PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Appeal from the Eleventh District. Suit on two notes, before the Court, a jury being waived. The issue was as to the authority of Bryant to execute the notes sued on, so as to bind a certain Quartz Company. The finding was as follows: J. M. Bryant, by whom the notes sued on were made, had no authority, as Superintendent of the Cosumnes Talley Quartz Mill Company, to make notes in the name of, or binding upon, said company.

1Opinion of the CourtTerry, C. J.

Baldwin, J. concurring.

No motion for a new trial having been made in this case, the finding of facts by the Court below is conclusive, and as this finding fully sustains the judgment, it is affirmed.

2Cited by1 opinion

  1. Allen v. FennonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1864