Welty v. Clute
District Court, W.D. New York
1Opinion of the Court
KNIGHT, District Judge.
Two motions are presented for decision: One to take the deposition of the plaintiff; the other for discovery.
Upon plaintiff’s application, his deposition was taken for the purpose of perpetuating his testimony. The plaintiff was examined and cross-examined at length. I have carefully read and re-read this deposition. While many of the answers of the plaintiff upon the cross-examination are not responsive to questions put, it seems to me that the deposition in its entirety answers all that is material in the examination now proposed and that a further examination is not…
2Cited by4 opinions
- English v. CowellDistrict Court, C.D. Illinois · 1986
- Perry v. Kelly-Springfield Tire Co.District Court, N.D. Indiana · 1987
- Tramm v. Porter Memorial HospitalDistrict Court, N.D. Indiana · 1989
- Jones v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co.District Court, N.D. Indiana · 1990