Parker v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
The opinion states the case.
1Opinion of the Court
PRENDERGAST, Judge.
Appellant appeals from a conviction for murder. The evidence was wholly circumstantial to establish his guilt. He did not testify.
Appellant has this bill which,- after the proper heading, shows: "That on the trial of the above styled and numbered cause, that after the introduction of the evidence had been closed by both the State and the defendant, and after the charge of the court had been read to the jury, and while the county attorney, the Hon. Roy Baskin, was opening the case for the State that he did say to the jury, and use the following language substantially:…
2Cited by4 opinions
- Anderson v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1921
- Steele v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1938
- Compton v. JayTexas Supreme Court · 1965
- Compton v. JayTexas Supreme Court · 1965