Legal Opinion

Bischoffsheim v. Brown

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York

Decided December 23, 1886PublishedCited by 6 opinions

In Equity.

1Opinion of the CourtWallace, J.

This is a motion on behalf of the defendants Seligman & Brown to compel production by the plaintiff for inspection of books, papers, and documents described in Exhibit A, annexed to moving papers. The proofs in the cause arc being taken orally before an examiner, and certain witnesses for the plaintiff have testified that the papers and documents are under the control of the plaint! if. The papers specified in Exhibit A are not any particular book, document, or writing, but comprise all or a great number of several classes of papers, some of which may possibly bo found when examined to…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Merchants' Nat. Bank of Boston v. State Nat. Bank of BostonU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts · 1868

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Dancel v. Goodyear Shoe Machinery Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts · 1904
  2. United States v. Terminal R. Ass'nU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Missouri · 1907
  3. Kirkpatrick v. Pope Manuf'g Co.District Court, D. Connecticut · 1894
  4. Oro Water, Light & Power Co. v. City of OrovilleU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Northern California · 1908
  5. Dixie Drinking Cup Co. v. Paper Utilities Co.District Court, E.D. New York · 1925

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API