Legal Opinion
United States v. William L. Harris (03-6207) Tarvis Holmes (03-6255)
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided February 8, 2005No. 03-6207, 03-6255PublishedCited by 50 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
MOORE, Circuit Judge.
This case requires us to determine whether the Supreme Court’s recent decision in United States v. Booker, — U.S. -, 125 S.Ct. 738, 160 L.Ed.2d 621 (2005), extends to judicial fact-determinations under 18 U.S.C. § 924(c)(1)(B)(i) (“ § 924 Firearm-Type Provision”) and its accompanying U.S. Sentencing Guidelines (“Guidelines”) provision, § 2K4.2(b). U.S. SENTENCING GuiDELINES MANUAL (“U.S.S.G.”) § 2K2.4. Section 924(c)(1) is the federal statute providing for mandatory additional sentences for “any person who, during and in relation to any crime of violence or drug…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- United States v. BookerSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Blakely v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Almendarez-Torres v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by50 opinions
- United States v. Steven Douglas DareCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
- United States v. Michael Gerald GamboaCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2006
- United States v. GobbiCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2006
- United States v. StewartCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2010
- United States v. CiszkowskiCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2007
45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.