Hooper v. Batdorff
Michigan Supreme Court
Certiorari to Calhoun; Hopkins, J. Mandamus by Joseph L. Hooper, prosecuting attorney, to compel Howard H. Batdorff, a justice of the peace, to issue a warrant. There was an order denying the writ, and relator brings certiorari.
1Opinion of the CourtHooker, J.
Griswold had been practicing medicine prior to September, 1903, in violation of law (Act No. 337, Pub. Acts 1899), not having been registered as thereby required. In September, 1903, Act No. 191 of that year took effect (Act No. 191, Pub. Acts 1903), being amendatory to the act first cited. Griswold has since continued to practice medicine without any effort to comply with such laws. On January 33, 1905, relator presented a sworn complaint to the respondent, requesting him to file the same and to issue a warrant for said Griswold, under the provisions of said act. This was refused, and…
2Cited by1 opinion
- Commonwealth v. PetrySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1922