Legal Opinion

Lettner v. Plummer

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided December 27, 1977PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

HARBISON, Justice.

Appellants seek review of the determination of an Administrative Hearing Officer, affirmed by the Chancellor, that the sum of nine thousand six dollars ($9,006.00) taken from them by police officials was subject to forfeiture under the 1971 Drug Control Act, T.C.A. §§ 52-1408 et seq.

After a full hearing, in which conflicting evidence was introduced on disputed issues of fact, the Administrative Judge held that the money seized had been received by appellants “in consideration for or in exchange for a controlled substance” in violation of the Act. Reviewing this…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Humana of Tennessee v. Tennessee Health Facilities CommissionTennessee Supreme Court · 1977

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. In re C.W.W.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 2000
  2. In re M.A.R.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 2005
  3. McEwen v. Tennessee Department of SafetyCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2005
  4. In re A.D.A.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 2002
  5. Hibdon v. GrabowskiCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2005

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API