Legal Opinion

West Side Women's Services, Inc. v. City of Cleveland

District Court, N.D. Ohio

Decided August 22, 1984No. C77-1112Published

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

BATTISTI, Chief Judge.

On October 21, 1983, in a Memorandum Opinion and Order, this Court found that Section -231.09 of the Codified Ordinances of the City of Cleveland impermissibly interferes with a woman’s right to seek an abortion, and, so, unconstitutionally infringes upon a fundamental right guaranteed by the Constitution. 573 F.Supp. 504. Because said Ordinance is unconstitutional, the Court, having concluded that plaintiffs were impermissibly prevented from opening an abortion service at the intended site, granted plaintiffs’ Motion for Partial Summary…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Bradley v. School Bd. of RichmondSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  2. Mills v. Electric Auto-Lite Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
  3. Maher v. GagneSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  4. Hanrahan v. HamptonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  5. Deerfield Medical Center, Medallion Executive Consultants, Inc. v. City of Deerfield Beach, City Commission of Deerfield BeachCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1981

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API