Legal Opinion

Fidelity Storage Co. v. Jaques

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided December 12, 1932No. 5560PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

VAN ORSDEL, Associate Justice,

Appellee, plaintiff below, stored, her household goods and personal effects.-with the defendant Fidelity Storage Company. Through defendants Karriek and Plager, persons connected and associated with, the storage company, plaintiff secured two loans, one for $100 and one for $500, fpr which she gave her notes secured by a chattel mortgage on the property stored.

The bill charges that the goods were sold to satisfy the mortgage without notice to her and without any due notice of sale, and that the disposition of the property was conducted in such manner as- to…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. United States ex rel. Philips v. BaileyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1927

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Brown v. Randle & Garvin, Inc.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1943
  2. Creel v. CreelCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1945
  3. Fidelity Storage Co. v. JaquesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1935
  4. Murchison v. Inter-City Mortgage Corporation Profit Sharing & Pension PlansCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2008
  5. Murchison v. Inter-City Mortgage Corporation Profit Sharing & Pension PlansCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API