Legal Opinion
Warnert v. MGM PROPERTIES
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided February 12, 1985No. CX-84-1519PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
LANSING, Judge.
Harold Warnert began this unlawful de-tainer proceeding against his tenant, MGM Properties, and against MGM Properties’ subtenant, Richard Schmidt, alleging MGM Properties’ failure to pay rent. The day before trial MGM Properties and Warnert entered into a stipulation of settlement that included MGM Properties’ surrender of the premises to Warnert. Warnert and Schmidt proceeded to hearing, with Schmidt defending by depositing the claimed arrearages with the court. The trial court concluded that Warnert was entitled to possession of the property as a matter of law and…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Kirkland v. OdumSupreme Court of Georgia · 1923
- Appleton v. AmesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1889
- Streeter v. MiddlemasCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1965
- Baum v. TazwellNew Jersey Circuit Court · 1948
- Hawley Corp. v. West Virginia Broadcasting Corp.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1938
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- American Community Stores Corp. v. NewmanNebraska Supreme Court · 1989
- Green Tree Servicing, LLC v. DBSI Landmark Towers, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2011
- Schwartz v. Bobby's International, Inc.Supreme Court of The Virgin Islands · 1991
- Southcross Commerce Center, LLP v. Tupy Properties, LLCCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2009